In This Series:
- Gossip as History: Anne Boleyn, Part 1
- Gossip as History: The Murder of Amy Robsart.
- Gossip as History: Figure Flingers, Poisoners and Shrovetide Plays.
- Gossip as History: The Letters of John Chamberlain.
Sometime shortly after 1543, the Greek traveler Nicander
Nucius arrived on the shores of
England. He was an educated man
who had suffered reverses of some sort in his own country and decided to seek
opportunities elsewhere. Among other
adventures, he had served in the 1533 special embassy from Emperor Charles V to
the Sultan
Suleiman in Constantinople.
The embassy was headed by Gerard Veltwick of Ravestein, who seems to
have been a personal acquaintance.
Another special embassy lead by Veltwick, still served by Nucius, presented
its credentials to the council of Henry VIII some ten years later, after his
marriage to Catherine Parr.
There can be little doubt, then, that Nucius kept company
largely with educated administrators of the the Court. These were surely the companions who informed
him of so much that he dutifully recorded in his diary. They did not talk at all like a history text,
of course. They were Tudors through and
through, colorful in their descriptions and opinionated.
Among the topics they discussed was Anne Boleyn who
“happened to be stored with general learning, and those sciences common to us,
and subtle in arguing; but yet, as it appeared, reprehensible in conduct,
since, with the connivance of her mother, she had an illicit intercourse with
her own brother, through a desire of having children, as she had none from
Henry.”[1] Nearly ten years had passed but Boleyn
remained a popular subject of conversation.
The talking points of Henry’s partisans, explaining why her execution
was justified were adhered to in conversation.
They had become established facts.
This is more than just gossip, I submit. It is a vital part of the historical record. Courtiers and administrators actions were
affected not as much by what we find in the history books as by persistent
shaping of consensual reality through conversation often only vaguely related
to truth.
The execution of a Queen being a shocking act, far reaching
in its effects, it was essential (and delightfully lurid as so much gossip is) for
the King to act only on what he had seen with his own eyes.
Such a thing, therefore, having come to the King's knowledge,
and he being desirous of beholding the fact with his own eyes, became a
spectator of the detestable crime.
The King secretly observed them having incestual sex. There needed be no issue of the veracity of
witnesses. He had seen it with his own
eyes.
Having been observed in flagrante delicto, she immediately and
fully confessed.
She replied as follows : "That I have thus acted towards
your bed, my Lord, I can no longer deny; but acknowledge that these things are
true. For the crime, being very great, does not admit of defence. I am convicted
of being incestuous, and an adultress.
Inflict what punishment you please on me,…”
There could be no doubt of the crime. She confessed and virtually called down the
punishment upon herself. The King’s
picked jury was in no position to do anything else but to return a verdict of
“guilty” and pass the just punishment.
It was by no means only after Anne Boleyn was dead that she
became the subject of gossip. Eustace
Chapuis, ambassador from Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor, to the English
Court, during the marriage controversy is the main source of information about
the intrigues surrounding it. He was
diligent in recruiting sources in the English court for which reason his
information was often correct.
Nevertheless, his information was rumor and gossip and susceptible to exaggeration
and outright fiction.
Information also came from the Emperor’s agents in Rome such
as Giovan Antonio Muxetula. However smitten the King was with Anne Boleyn, Muxetula’s
report that, having angered her he went abjectly to her parents and “implored
them with tears in his eyes to appease her wrath”[2]
seems a bit out of character. It is,
however, a romantic story and surely the hearts of the ladies at court were all
aflutter to hear it and hurried to repeat the tale until it made its way to the
Holy City.
The allies of Queen Catherine — the greatest among them
being the Emperor — were surely all aflutter themselves to read in a letter
from Chapuis, a few days before Christmas, in 1531, that “It is reported that
the Lady [Anne] has had a miscarriage.”[3] Of course, Anne Boleyn’s entire leverage for
becoming Queen was that she would not sleep with the King until they were
married. Had she done so, she would
instantly have become just another mistress and history would have turned out quite
differently.
Chapuis scooped the other professional gossips, and the vast
majority of the English, on the other hand, when the diplomatic pouch held a
letter to the Emperor explaining that “not later than a week ago” Anne “wrote a
letter to her principal friend and favourite here… bidding her get ready
against this journey”[4]
to the Cloth of Gold meeting, in Calais.
It was considered fact that Henry VIII would not make such a blunder nor
the French King Francois I countenance such a thing. But Chapuis had witnessed the rich new gowns
arriving and the jewels being transferred from Queen Catherine. His gossip with Anne’s BFF left him confident
on the point.
[1]
Nucius, Nicander. The Second Book of the Travels of Nicander Nucius of
Corcyra (c. 1550). J. A. Cramer, tr.
Camden Society (1841). 45-7.
[2] Letters,
Despatches, and State Papers, Relating to the Negotiations Between England and
Spain, Preserved in the Archives at Simancas and Elsewhere. Vol. 4, Pt. 2 (1531-1533). Jan. 23, 1531. 37.
[4]
Ibid., Aug. 26, 1532. 495.
Also at Virtual Grub Street:
- Zombie Apocalypse & Trick-or-Treating: Halloween through History. October 30, 2019. “Looking closely, however, we see that this Shakespeare quote has moved the “puling” (which it was actually called) back one day to Hallowmas, All Hallows Day, rather than All Souls. Far more important, he has actually referred to puling as a special kind of speech spoken by beggars on Hallowmas Day.”
- A Brief Introduction to Poisoning a Nobleman. August 4, 2019. “As those who read the primary accounts whenever possible know, never were vagaries so vague as in the Middle Ages.”
- A Most Curious Account of the Funeral of Queen Elizabeth I: April 28, 1603. April 28, 2019. “Once it was clear that James I would face no serious challenges, Cecil and the others could begin to give attention to the matter of the Queen’s funeral.”
- Stratford Shakespeare’s Undersized Grave. July 22, 2018. “Mr. Coll’s considers this evidence to support an old rumor that Shakspere’s head had been stolen in 1794. But I submit that he is merely making his observation based upon a coincidence.”
- Check out the English Renaissance Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
- Check out the Medieval Topics Article Index for many more articles about this fascinating time.
- Zombie Apocalypse & Trick-or-Treating: Halloween through History. October 30, 2019. “Looking closely, however, we see that this Shakespeare quote has moved the “puling” (which it was actually called) back one day to Hallowmas, All Hallows Day, rather than All Souls. Far more important, he has actually referred to puling as a special kind of speech spoken by beggars on Hallowmas Day.”
- A Brief Introduction to Poisoning a Nobleman. August 4, 2019. “As those who read the primary accounts whenever possible know, never were vagaries so vague as in the Middle Ages.”
- A Most Curious Account of the Funeral of Queen Elizabeth I: April 28, 1603. April 28, 2019. “Once it was clear that James I would face no serious challenges, Cecil and the others could begin to give attention to the matter of the Queen’s funeral.”
- Stratford Shakespeare’s Undersized Grave. July 22, 2018. “Mr. Coll’s considers this evidence to support an old rumor that Shakspere’s head had been stolen in 1794. But I submit that he is merely making his observation based upon a coincidence.”
- Check out the English Renaissance Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
- Check out the Medieval Topics Article Index for many more articles about this fascinating time.
No comments:
Post a Comment