The Holder of this blog uses no cookies and collects no data whatsoever. He is only a guest on the Blogger platform. He has made no agreements concerning third party data collection and is not provided the opportunity to know the data collection policies of any of the standard blogging applications associated with the host platform. For information regarding the data collection policies of Facebook applications used on this blog contact Facebook. For information about the practices regarding data collection on the part of the owner of the Blogger platform contact Google Blogger.

Friday, September 17, 2021

Mr. Bright’s Sale Catalogue and Plagiarizing Shakespeare.

The Anonymous Correspondent to the January 15, 1845, number of Athenaeum: Journal of English and Foreign Literature,  Science and the Fine Arts, began his report on "The Catalogue of the projected sale of the library of Mr. B. H. Bright, late of Bristol", by dismissing Mr. Bright’s claim that Hamlet must have been written before 1600. In the process, the Correspondent went on to describe several of the many “plagiarisms” from the works of Shakespeare by Mr. Robert Nicholson and others. Those which do not challenge the traditional dates of the Stratfordian Shakespeare he finds perfectly compelling.

Even more interesting was a 1598 reference in a poem by a Mr. Robert Tofte to having watched a play by Shakespeare. The name of the playwright does not seem to have been of particular concern to Mr. Tofte.

Curiously, by the reasoning that underlies a certain theory current among us, Mr. Nicholson’s work, as well as Mr. R.S.’s, can only properly be assigned to William Shakspere of Stratford-upon-Avon which means it can in turn only properly be assigned to Thomas North, in the final chain of analysis. The language matches, by the theory’s mathematics, compel us to accept this conclusion.

While upon Shakspeare, we may say a few words respecting rare books that incidentally more or less illustrate him; and, first of Nicholson’s (not Nichols, as the name is accidentally misprinted in the  Catalogue) ‘Acolastus,’ quarto, 1600. Shakspeare’s ‘Hamlet’ was first printed (though most defectively) in 1603, and first acted, there is little doubt, in 1602; and Mr. Bright has noted the following lines in ‘Acolastus,’ as if they established that ‘Hamlet’ must have been written before 1600, because it is plagiarized by Nicholson: we ask, where is the plagiarism ? where is even the resemblance?

Art thou a god, a man, or else a ghost?

Com’st thou from heaven, where bliss and solace dwell,

Or from the airy cold-engendering coast,

Or from the darksome dungeon-hole of hell?

Or from the secret chambers of the deep?

Or from the graves where breathless bodies sleep?

We suppose, but we can only suppose, that Mr. Bright had in his memory, and that very imperfectly, the address of Hamlet to the spirit of his father. Certainly Nicholson could have known nothing about it, and if there were any plagiarism at all, it must have been by and not from Shakspeare. ‘True it is, that Nicholson was a gross and shameless plagiary, but in this instance, he could have had no such original before him; and we will show that when he did copy, he had no remorse. Compare, for instance, the following couplet, with two lines not far from the close of ‘Venus and Adonis’:—

Look, how a bright star shooteth in the night,

So fast she fled and vanish’d from my sight.

What are Shakspeare’s words ?—

 

Look, how a bright star shooteth from the sky,

So glides he in the night from Venus’s eye.

Nothing would be easier than to multiply instances of Nicholson’s thefts from various authors, but another proof will be sufficient. In one place he exclaims—

If on the earth there may be found a hell,

Within my soul her several torments dwell.

This is stolen without compunction, and almost verbatim, from Nash’s ‘Pierce Penniless,’ 1592, where the lines stand :—

Divines and dying men may talk of hell,

But in my heart her several torments dwell.

But Nicholson was not the only author whose work is found in this Catalogue, who plagiarized from Shakspeare’s ‘Venus and Adonis,’ although Mr. Bright does not seem to have been aware of the fact: he discovered a resemblance where none existed, but failed to note it where it really occurred. A person using the initials R. S. (possibly the compiler also of a collection of poems, called ‘The Phoenix Nest,’ of which we shall have occasion to speak hereafter) printed a poem in 1598, under the title of ‘Phillis and Flora,’ where these lines, descriptive of a horse, are met with :—

His mane thin hair'd, his neck high crested,

Smail ear, short head, and burly breasted ;

Straight legg’d, large thigh’d, and hollow hooved,

All Nature’s skill in him was proved.

Compare with them the subsequent well-remembered passage, relating to a horse, in ‘Venus and Adonis’:—

Round hoof'd, short jointed, the fetlocks shag and long,

Broad breast, full eye, small head, and nostril wide,

High crest, short ears, straight legs, and passing strong,

Thin mane, thick tail, broad buttock, tender hide.


If, therefore, Mr. Bright had been bent upon finding plagiarisms from Shakspeare among his books, he need not have gone far, nor have dwelt upon such a fanciful proof, as he supposed he had discovered in Nicholson’s ‘Acolastus,’ that ‘Hamlet’ was written before 1600. As regards the illustration of Shakspeare, there is in the collection a small volume which contains a remarkable mention, by name, of a particular play, which was printed in the same year as the book: the name of the play is ‘Love's Labour's Lost,’ and the title of the volume recording in verse its performance is, ‘ Alba, or the Month’s Mind of a Melancholy Lover,’ 12mo., 1598. The passage to which we refer is long, but it begins as follows:—

‘Love’s Labour Lost,’ I once did see, a play

Ycleped so—so called to my pain.

And then the author (Robert Tofte) proceeds to describe it, and even states the manner in which the actors performed :—

Each actor play’d in cunning wise his part,

But chiefly those entrapp'd in Cupid’s snare, &c.

Here was a point, connected with the history of one of Shakspeare’s very earliest dramatic productions, upon which Mr. Bright might have dwelt; and, although it has been adverted to before, it might have been noticed by the compiler of the Catalogue as giving a peculiar value to the work in which it is found.


Also at Virtual Grub Street:

 

 

 

No comments: