The Holder of this blog uses no cookies and collects no data whatsoever. He is only a guest on the Blogger platform. He has made no agreements concerning third party data collection and is not provided the opportunity to know the data collection policies of any of the standard blogging applications associated with the host platform. For information regarding the data collection policies of Facebook applications used on this blog contact Facebook. For information about the practices regarding data collection on the part of the owner of the Blogger platform contact Google Blogger.

Sunday, September 27, 2020

Sir John Mason to Principal Secretary Sir William Cecil. January 28, 1562.

This letter from Sir John Mason, a member of the Queen’s Privy Council, informs William Cecil and ourselves of the murmuring going around London regarding the arrest and imprisonment of the Lady Catherine Grey. The citizens of the city wielded more power and influence than is generally known. What was being said and what the tone were important and surely worrisome news at Court.

That said, Mason’s feeling that severe punishment was also in order for the young Earl of Hertford, to whom Catherine had secretly been married, was more than seconded by the Queen. The people of Elizabeth's realm from the highest to the lowest had constantly been imploring her to marry and provide a (male) heir since her coronation. Suddenly, the woman arguably next in line to her in order of royal blood had an heir handy any time they might choose to place her on the throne — and a husband to give the ship of state a male hand at the tiller. That marriage and heir were crises of the greatest consequence. The politics could destroy her then three year old reign.

The answer to London and others would be a show of raw power. The matter was handed over to the shadowy Star Chamber court.  The court had been created as one of the first acts of the reign of Henry VII[1] in order to bypass normal legal process, and, often enough, the law altogether, in order to bring the nobility to heel. Early in the reign of Elizabeth it was still fearfully powerful.

It is not clear that the Chamber had time to have initiated proceedings before word was out that the young Earl had managed to visit his wife in her prison cell, and, as the result, she had delivered a second child. A month after Mason’s letter any leniency the Queen might have felt was gone. The severity of the punishment was stunning:

the earl was heavily fined—15,000 marks in all; 5000 for “seducing a virgin of the blood royal"; 5000 for breaking prison—i. e. when he left his own apartments to visit Lady Katherine; and 5000 for the birth of the second child, described by the Chamber as "a bastard." The earl not having sufficient money to pay this sum off-hand, his estates were, as usual in such cases, confiscated instead.[2]

The danger must simply be removed at any cost. The marriage was declared invalid and the children bastards. Hertford was essentially accused of statutory rape. The penalty for these indiscretions was the ruination of his estates.

The Queen did eventually relent. At length, Hertford’s fine was reduced to just under ₤1200.[3] Catherine, however, would spend all but about a year of the rest of her short life in The Tower. Her pleas and her promises went unheard.

S I R,

I HADDE thowght too have coom this Morning to the Court, aswell too declare untoo yow thadvyses of Italye, which I sende to you herewith, as to have spoken with you three or four Wordes in another Matter. The fowle Weather hath stayed me, and therfore I have thought goode too wright, what I wold have sayd. There be abrode both in the Cite, and in sondry other Places of the Realme, very brode Speaches of the Case of Therl of Hertford: Summ following theyre lewde Affections, and summe others of Ignorance make such talks therof, as lyketh them; nott letting too say they be Man and Wief, and whye sholde Men and Wief be lett from coming together? Theise Speaches and others, as I am informed be very common; which as I am sure, you can, and doo very well consider, wolde out of Hande be mett withall. And too tell my folishe Judgement for the Way thereof, me thinketh it wyll no ill Way to call him to the Starre-Chamber, and there, after a good Declaration of the Queenes Procedings for the Tryall of the Treuth of the supposed Mariage, and what was fownde and judged, then too charge him with his presumptuous, contemptuous and outragious Demeanour, and Behaviour in the using of the Lady Catharyne, both before the Sentence, as sythence; and in the Ende too sett a Fyne upon his Hedde of ten Marks; if they be made Pownds, it shall be little inough. There is not a more oultreayd [Fr. oultré, Eng. over the top, outrageous] Youth (I speake French for lack of apt English) within the Realme, nether one that better lyketh himſelf, nether that promysseth himself greater Things. He wolde be made to learne himself. His Imprisonment fattneth him, and rather hath he therby Comodyte, then Hinderaunce. If a goodde Part of his lyving mought answerre summ Part of his Offence, and thempriſomment therwithall continew, itt wolde mak him too know what itt is, to have so arrogantly and contemptuously offended his Prince, and wolde make him hereafter better to know himsellfe and his Duetye both to the State, and too All mighty Godde, of whome I think he have very small Remembraunce: I beseche you pardon my rude scribling and my boldnes shewed in the same, and too way my goodde Meanings in the Matter, and nothing ells. And thus Allmigty Godde have you in his most blessed keping, and assist you allway with his present Grace.

Scriblid in hast, thys 28th Day of January, 1562.

 

 Source: Haynes, Samuel. State Papers, Relating to Affairs… From the Year 1542 to 1570. (1740), 396.



[1] The Star Chamber was the location in which a special senior advisory council had met on and off for centuries. Henry VII greatly expanded its purview and power.

[2] Davey, Richard. The Sisters of Lady Jane Grey and Their Wicked Grandfather (1911). 189-90.

[3] Locke, A. Audrey. The Seymour Family (1911). 79. “Of this Elizabeth remitted 10,000, demanding that ₤1000 should be paid immediately. Finally, the earl paid ₤1187.”


Also at Virtual Grub Street:

  • Gossip as History: The Murder of Amy Robsart. February 17, 2020. "The first sudden death Leicester was rumored to have caused was that of his wife, Amy Robsart, in 1560. In that year, it was still not clear whether the Queen would marry. But certainly not her beloved Leicester if he were married."
  • A Most Curious Account of the Funeral of Queen Elizabeth I: April 28, 1603.  April 28, 2019.  “Once it was clear that James I would face no serious challenges, Cecil and the others could begin to give attention to the matter of the Queen’s funeral.”
  • Queen Elizabeth I’s Heart and the French Ambassador.  April 3, 2019.  “…the Queen of England, with the permission of her physicians, has been able to come out of her private chamber, she has permitted me… to see her…”
  • Account of a Performance of Macbeth: April 20, 1611. September 30, 2018. “One detail of this account, in particular, promises to go a long way toward understanding the date of composition and a key detail as to the state of the text in 1611.”
  • Check out the English Renaissance Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
  • Check out the English Renaissance Letter Index for many letters from this fascinating time, some related to the Shakespeare Authorship Question.

  • No comments: