My good Lord.
Although it is all one, in my
opinion whether her Majesty send down or not to have anybody join with Middleton,
for that I am not acquainted with the points of his message which if they be
but as I do hear, are little to the advancement of this service, but rather a
deter[ance] and hindrance thereto. Yet concerning the main point upon which I
most force, that is that her Majesty should not lose the benefit of this year,
to that part of my desire I have of no ear given. Wherefore assuring myself
that your Lordship will further her Majesty’s profit and assist them that shall
go about the same earnestly, I would gladly put your Lordship in remembrance
that the chiefest part of my request was to have her Majesty’s Letter, for the
stay of Tin, that none should be bought or sold till this month be past, or about
St James’s tide. In which time she may have leisure to consider what course will
be most for her benefit, and not to suffer a matter of such moment as this,
which is too great for any subject, for a small trifle to herself, by too much
haste to slip her hands.
The matter of Time to busy about
the quantity, is but frivolous, and I know not to what purpose, since it might
be easlier known here, then by examination of Sir Francis Godolphin’s Roles,
for the deceit there cannot be perceived, that will only stand upon affirming
and denying without control.
The money which he yearly pays to
the Queen declares sufficiently, for if he pay to her Majesty 2400l
rent, then is that after 40s the 1000l weight, 1200 a thousand
pound weight, and if the remain which is to come to the account of the year following,
if it be a hundred or two ^100^ thousand Tin, that is but a 200 or 400th matter
more of money. Which is too small a trifle to stand upon at this present.
The deceit lie where the Tin is
transported, and when the Stocks be underrated, as where 4 Blocks should be a
thousand, it is commonly seen that three Blokes attain to that quantity.
Wherefore my Lord I insist still
to crave her Majesty’s letter for the stay of the Tin that none be bought and
sold, till her Majesty be thoroughly satisfied what will be her pleasure. And
in the mean season, that it shall rise much more to her benefit then otherwise.
Then I am to advertise Roberts, to draw in his money whereof I know at his last
being in town he left here a good some. About this matter I must and so he is
determined to send Alderman Cacher down, who I know will not be negligent to
perform the service. Then there is no let but to appoint another to join with him for the other Moiety,
and if Alderman Hawlton be ready to take such a charge upon him alone, then is it
much more easier being joined with another. And since he has already deceived
her Majesty of 40 thousand pound, as when he had for 12 or 14 year together the
impost of wines, under his master: why should he think much to recompense the
same now in her Majesty’s service, rating to her so great a commodity, and to
himself no small revenue.
If 40 thousand pound laid out yield
some four or five and twenty thousand pound gain, as the return and the use of
this money comes to no less, why shall it not be thought, if her Majesty has
half with them, and they five or six thousand pound a year. That this is the
best way for her Majesty and a reasonable commodity, for them, whose proportions,
few noble men in England attain to the like in their livings. I do not doubt
but Hawtone may very well be satisfied with five or six thousand pound a year,
a portion that may content any subject in the land.
Your Lordship’s to Command
(signed) Edward Oxenford
Also at Virtual Grub Street:
- Shakespeare and Thomas North. April 5, 2021. “It might have been more of a surprise if North had not been advanced after one or another fashion.”
- On Shakespeare and Drinking Smoke. January 4, 2021. “The debate raged for some time: Had Shakespeare smoked pot? Tobacco? Both?”
- On the Question “Who knew Edward de Vere was Shakespeare?” December 14, 2020. “But was the word going around that his wife, the Countess of Oxford, conceived two children in his absence?”
- A 1572 Oxford Letter and the Player’s Speech in Hamlet. August 11, 2020. “The player’s speech has been a source of consternation among Shakespeare scholars for above 200 years. Why was Aeneas’ tale chosen as the subject?”
- Check out the English Renaissance Article Index for many more articles and reviews about this fascinating time and about the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
- Check out the Letters Index: Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford for many letters from this fascinating time, some related to the Shakespeare Authorship Question.
No comments:
Post a Comment